Dean Vipond Logo

Posts Tagged ‘User Experience’

Can a brand have as many voices as customers?

Friday, January 22nd, 2010

Could technology drive a bespoke brand experience? I touched on this notion during my talk at Future of Web Design, but didn’t have the time to explore it further. There seems to be a shift towards very specific personalisation when it comes to our experience of many products and services. Spotify playlists, iGoogle, Ensembli, etc. all provide a framework for us to experience and consume things hand-picked by ourselves. It’s something we’re getting very used to. Indeed, there was a lot of grumbling when Twitter introduced its new ‘retweet’ feature, as people were all-of-a-sudden seeing comments in their news feed from users they hadn’t specifically chosen to view. So how could a brand possibly support this continued drive towards personalisation, while retaining some semblance of identity itself?

Your M&S isnt really yours. Its still theirs.

Your M&S isn't really 'yours'. It's still 'theirs'.

 

Consistently inconsistent

Just because a brand is a unique entity does not mean it can’t shift its personality to suit whomever it may be addressing. We all have distinct personalities, but we all alter our behaviour depending on to whom we are talking. Personally, I talk and act slightly differently depending on whether I’m with friends, business clients, or my children. Despite my changing behaviour, all these people recognise me as ‘Dean’. By the same token, I always know I’m ‘me’. Could a brand do this?

Of course, many brands have employed differing voices to communicate with different sections of their audience, but it’s still a relatively blanket approach, based on a combination of research and best guesses. Yet no research, however specific, could hope to facilitate communication on an individual level. Technology could facilitate this.

 

What technology?

There is a project that’s been developed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology called Personas which aggregates your online activity, to create a visual represenation of your time on the Web. You are presented with a graph, which categorises the subjects you have spent time being involved with. It’s an interesting little project, but it got me thinking: could we not also track and analyse the language people use online?

 

Twitter, Facebook, blogs, forums, comments… regular web users have a huge wealth of thoughts and opinions in the public domain. If we had the technology, we could see what people think on myriad subjects, and what language they use to express themselves. Could a brand not harness this information and use it to deliver the ultimate personalised experience, one which not only provides the content, products and services a customer is interested in, but delivers it in a voice specific to them?

While it can take years for an audience to develop a sense of trust in a brand, why can’t a brand harness a voice each customer already trusts – their own?

 

How could it work?

Let’s look at Amazon.com as a possible case study. For years, Amazon has utilised a customer’s browsing and purchasing habits, as well as those of others, to deliver a powerful recommendation service – one which continues to impress me. However, look and feel of the site aside, there’s no real personality to accompany this, and it feels something of a missed opportunity.

What if Amazon could not only access a customer’s activity on its own site, but that person’s entire online activity? It would have a much deeper understanding of someone’s likes, dislikes, motivations, not to mention the kind of language they use. If a user was comfortable with colloquialisms, text speak, longer words, even bad language, Amazon could recognise this and alter its voice to suit, while still providing the level of service people associate with the brand.

Examples of how Amazon could shift its personality

Examples of how Amazon could shift its personality

 

Everyone would have a unique experience of, and relationship with Amazon, and Amazon’s brand would be strengthened by this. Yet through its other brand touchpoints (service, visual communication, etc.) it would assert a distinct brand personality. As with myself and how people see me, everyone would have a distinct view of Amazon, yet it would still be instantly and consistently recognised.

 

Technology driving brand development

This kind of ultra-personalised experience would only be possible with emerging technology, that not only recognises and matches words, data and so on, but can also understand meaning, context and subtlety. This is what is so interesting and exciting right now. Technology isn’t just offering new touchpoints for customer contact. It is allowing brands to do things they’ve never done before. Those brands which can recognise and exploit such possibilities stand to make massive progress in the coming years.

Are Facebook’s vanity URLs in vain?

Tuesday, June 16th, 2009

There’s been quite a buzz over the last few days around Facebook introducing vanity URLs, but is it really what users need? Of course, the word ‘vanity’ denotes that it doesn’t meet a user ‘need’ and is an added bonus, but is this going to satisfy those who were unhappy with the recent redesign, or who have migrated to newer, shinier services such as Twitter?

Every time Facebook has been redesigned, there has been an outcry from certain groups of users, resistant to change, and calling for their previous comfort zone to be returned to them forthwith. As someone who has worked on a number of site redesign projects, this is always par for the course, and while it is important to gauge users’ initial responses and thoughts, it’s how they feel after a month, or six months that is the real measure for the success of a redesign.

This is why I’ve waited a good while to comment on the newest iteration of the Facebook experience, so my own views on it can ‘bed in’ for a while. I’m sad to say that for once the angry mob are right. The latest Facebook just isn’t as good as the previous one. Its main downfall has been its faddish emulation of Twitter. The main page view now is a constantly-updated feed of all your friends’ activity, but with none of the brevity or elegance that makes Twitter such an engaging experience. Were it just a view of status updates, this would be more interesting, but now it seems to be a cavalcade of drivel, mostly relating to the endless quizzes which now seem to be the site’s main currency.

There’s no sense of relevance, of surfacing content you specifically may find interesting. Considering the amount of personal information the average user contributes to Facebook, it should be pretty easy to figure out what makes them tick. As Imran Ali questions: “Why can’t… Facebook [help] users make relevancy rather than recency based choices…”

A missed opportunity?

However, the introduction of vanity URLs has been a rather successful tactic for getting people talking about Facebook again, and this is where I feel they missed a trick. Quite a few posts on Twitter from people I follow went along the lines of “Just logged into Facebook for the first time in months to get my URL.” This would have been the perfect opportunity to test a refined design, or showcase some useful new features on a sub-set of users who had become jaded with the service. It would be interesting to know how this initiative has affected user numbers, and if it will encourage returning users to stick around.

Either way, it’s definitely time for Facebook to re-evaluate its offering to users, and think about what its brand stands for. It will never be able to effectively replace Twitter without sacrificing the richer content experience it currently offers. It’s time to hunker down, cut away the chaff and focus on what it does best – connecting friends and allowing them to have fun without drowning them in information.